Before we delve into history, lets try a brief quiz. If you were asked to provide one word, and only one, that by itself could be said to be the absolute key to all the power needed to control the entire history of the world and be leading us into a One World Government, what would that word be. Most folks would say money, and a few who think they are clever might say gold, but both would be wrong.
The correct word controls both all the gold and all the money in the world the word is credit. Whomsoever controls the right to extend credit, controls the world. As we shall see, The City of London and credible credit fit together like the proverbial love and marriage.
Do you know what is meant by the City of London � Actually, few people do. Most folks will think you're talking about the entire metropolitan area generally known as London, England but they would be wrong. When insiders refer to The City they are talking about a small area within the metropolitan London area. Here is a description from E. C. Knuths book Empire of the City first published in 1944.
"The City" is an international financial oligarchy and is perhaps the most arbitrary and absolute form of government in the world. This international financial oligarchy uses the allegoric "Crown" as its symbol of power and has its headquarters in the ancient City of London, an area of 677 acres; which strangely in all the vast expanse of the 443,455 acres of Metropolitan London alone is not under the jurisdiction of the Metropolitan Police, but has its own private force of about 2,000 men, while its night population is under 9,000.
So, we are talking about an area of about one square mile in size that is to London what the Vatican is to Rome. Technically one might argue that The City is not a sovereign entity like the Vatican is, but when we get right down to it, The City or The Crown is actually a corporation that is more than 800 years old and is, in fact, utterly independent though the folks in charge don't act like it much because they prefer to stay beneath the light of day.
About 350,000 people go to work in the City everyday. The 800-year old corporation is older than Parliament and the Anglican Church. The City of London has been a political entity since the 1100's. It is unique. Again, we glean data from E. C. Knuth:
This tiny area of a little over one square mile has in it the giant Bank of England, a privately owned institution; which is not subject to regulation by the British Parliament, and is in effect a sovereign world power. Within the City are located also the Stock Exchange and many institutions of worldwide scope. The City carries on its business of local government with a fanciful display of pompous medieval ceremony and with its officers attired in grotesque ancient costumes. Its voting power is vested in secret guilds with names of long extinct crafts such as the Mercers, Grocers, Fishmongers, Skinners, Vintners, etc. All this trivial pomp and absurdity and horse-play seems to serve very well to blind the eyes of the public to the big things going on behind the scenes; for the late Vincent Cartwright Vickers, once Deputy-Lieutenant of this City, a director of the great British armament firm of Vickers, Ltd., and a director of the Bank of England from 1910 to 1919, in his "Economic Tribulation" published 1940, lays the wars of the world on the door-step of the City.
One day, via Google and the Internet, I checked the city of London and found the corporation of the city of London That's where I learned that this corporate entity is one of the oldest sovereign institutions in all of Merry Olde England in fact, the only institution older is the throne itself.
Here's what it said on line:
Among local authorities the corporation is unique. Not only is it the oldest in the country, but it operates on a non-party political basis through its Lord Mayor, aldermen and members of the Common Counsel. (By the way these people all have to come from the Guilds and the Merchants.)The Lord Mayor plays an important diplomatic role with his overseas visits and functions at the Guild Hall and Mansion House for visiting Heads of State.
Wow, this guy has clout! In fact, under the established protocol, the Queen or King of England must bow to the Lord Mayor when the monarch visits inside The City.
It appears, with all this drivel for public consumption about the corporation on the Internet, that this is no conspiracy it is right out in the open. While admitting the City of London corporation is the center for financiers who are the leading extenders of credit in the world, they pretend to have lost this magical power of International Finance in the image they project today, but don't believe it. The City is some mysterious, probably Masonic, high cabal of a boardroom operating within this 800-year old entity that very quietly nods yeah or nay on the credit needs of Central Banks and Nations and massive multi-national business interests. If this high cabal had not approved the extending of credit to Hitler or to Lenin, for example, neither would have come to power. There is no revolution anywhere that has ever succeeded without money. So, don't believe that a high cabal is not calling the shots just as they did in the days of the Raj and Waterloo. (The Raj was the name for India during the heyday of the Empire, and the defeat of Napoleon at Waterloo was one of the high points in Crown history.)
Once again, from E. C. Knuth we learn:
That the British people and the British Parliament have little to say in the foreign affairs of the British Empire, and that the people of the British Empire must fight when International Finance and the City blow the trumpet, appears from the paean of praise by Andrew Carnegie, in his book: "Triumphant Democracy," published in 1886: My American readers may not be aware of the fact that, while in Britain an act of Parliament is necessary before works for a supply of water or a mile of railway can be constructed, six or seven men can plunge the nation into war, or, what is perhaps equally disastrous, commit it to entangling alliances without consulting Parliament at all. This is the most pernicious, palpable effect flowing from the monarchial theory, for these men do this in 'the king's Name,' who is in theory still a real monarch, although in reality only a convenient puppet, to be used by this cabal at pleasure to suit their own needs."
(The emphasis on International Finance, including the capital letters is my own International Finance is, indeed, a proper noun and a title worthy of special emphasis.)
A corporation is nothing more than a legal fiction. It is neither inherently good nor evil. The City of London is an English-speaking corporation, and historically it is the grandfather of all English language corporations and is, therefore, the very hub of what world history knows as The British Empire. Remember, for 200 years the sun never set on Brittania.
Since the International Financiers of this cabal were controllers of the Empire, we should pause for one moment to consider that that empire consisted of at its apex between WWI and WWII. Again, from Knuth:
Few Americans comprehend the immensity of the British Empire. The land area just before this war was 17 million square miles, not including the semi-colonial area of China. An area nearly six times greater than is the area of United States itself. To the 1,415,929 sq. miles taken by Britain from Germany at the conclusion of WWI there was added by purely imperialistic aggression another incredible 1,145,764 sq. miles in the period from 1925 to 1938.
Most of that latter land grab was in what's called the Middle East, and the ramifications of the empires policies are potent aspects of todays world news. If you are not impressed by the figure of 17 million square miles, consider that the figure is given only for landmass. The entire world landmass is less than 57.3 million square miles, so The City controlled practically a third of the world and virtually all of the oceans which make up four/fifths of our planet.
Let's see how this all came about.
Way back when the Romans conquered the British Isles, the city known as London had a population estimated at about 40,000 people. The area is ideally situated for a metropolis, thanks to the river Thames.
The birth date of modern England is considered to be 1066 - the Battle of Hastings where William the Conqueror forever blended Normans with the Anglo Saxons. This occurred during the so-called Dark Ages between the height of Rome and what is called the Restoration and Londons population had dwindled down to less than 12,000 people. The City is on the north side of the river, across from the southern bank area we now know as the suburb of Westminster, and this suburb is where the rulers of England and the British Isles established their capitol Westminster, not London. So, corporation and King were segregated early in the game.
Shortly after William the Conqueror established the British Throne in 1066, history tells us it didn't take long for the Merchant Guilds of London to flex their economic muscle muscle, incidentally that is known as Mercantilism.
In 1097 William the Conqueror died and his brother Henry needed the support of the London merchants. So King Henry went to them and said he would give them the right to levy taxes and elect the Sheriff in exchange for support and some cash.
Now, let's be practical. The merchant class and Mercantilism got to be powerful wherever they were because they supplied the needs of every day people, and earned good money doing it. In the Middle Ages the merchants brought in and marketed all the textiles, spices, salt, dyes, etc. whatever people wanted and needed. The Mercantile class was not a new social phenomenon; throughout all history the merchants have often ranked as high, or higher, than courtly aristocrats. It didn't take long for the Mercantile class to realize that they had the power of lending extending credit the most powerful manipulative tool of history. And somewhere very early in mans history the mercantilists and the priests got together to maintain control of the human economy, and they have never relinquished that control. It is important at this juncture to solidify a most important point the wedding of economics and religion.
I define religion as simply meaning whatever people rely upon in areas of life where they don't know the answers. This definition allows me to include power players of society other than the major well-known religions such as the Freemasons. The idea that secret societies like the Masons have infiltrated all the vital aspects of human society in order to promote an agenda of dominance over all individuals is not a kooky notion. The evidence is overwhelming that an evil influence has maintained this hidden agenda of gaining total control over mankind. It is evil because it does not have mans best interests at heart these people could care less about humanity, except to dominate us. God uplifts, but these Luciferians tear man down.
This essay is not focused on the philosophical good versus evil wars; it is about the history of todays global credit controllers the high cabal. I just want to make sure that you understand I am aware of the big picture.
Returning now to the City we learn that this most powerful Mercantile center began literally in the year 1191, around the time of the first crusade when King Richard I (the Lion-Hearted) was forced to acknowledge the right of self-government and the election of the first mayor of the City of London. Obviously he needed a big loan to outfit an army to make a crusade to the Holy Land the Third Crusade.
These London Merchants formed a corporation and established bylaws favoring the various guilds and Freemasons. For the next three centuries they dominated trade, and the Throne of England. For example, in 1461 the City supported Edward IV and he was so grateful, he Knighted everyone in the High Cabal.
For about 300 years London had plenty of competition with the Hanseatic League, a group of merchants of Northern Europe. The intrigues among the international mercantilists remain part and parcel of todays geopolitical agenda. Again, I get ahead of myself.
From the 14th to the 19th centuries the European economy was dominated by a sequence of leading mercantile cities; Venice followed by Antwerp, Genoa, Amsterdam and finally London. The growth of Londons population was phenomenal. Paris didn't grow in relation to the rest of France like London grew. Nor did Amsterdam grow in relation to the rest of Northwest Europe as London did. According to the World History Almanac:
The exceptional position of London may account for the rapid development of the English economy in the late 17th and 18th centuries at a time when London was absorbing half the natural increase of the entire population of the British Isles.
Family dynasties and the Throne of England are well-known Plantagenet, Tudor, Stuart, Hanover, Windsor etc however, the family dynasties in charge of The City were never really broadcast for public consumption. I bring this up only because some of the interesting points of history coming up have to do with different family rulers.
For example, Queen Elizabeth I (a Tudor) is lauded in history books for her exceptional expansion of British power before such a thing as Empire was even contemplated. She is credited for taking the seas away from Spain and starting Brittania of on its way to world dominance. But in truth she did nothing. The City financed and outfitted the ships and established the corporations of future conquest. Sir Francis Drake and Sir Walter Raleigh were creations of credit not necessarily of the Queen.
While Catholic missions were in the vanguard of Spanish conquest in the Americas, the British intrusion into areas of discovery were always under the aegis of a corporation. Every colony began as a business enterprise and the famous Hudson Bay Company as well as the East India Company are known to every student of history. The absolute connection to the extenders of credit is not played up in history books however.
Incidentally, just before Elizabeth, during the reign of the unfortunate Mary Queen of Scots in 1556 another important event took place in The City Thomas Gresham, a mercer which is one who deals in textiles, started an international exchange to sell stocks and bonds. In 1560, under Elizabeth, the exchange became the Royal Exchange and it is now housed in a massive Victoria building beside the Bank of England Museum in Mansion House Square, the City of London. The financial connection to the lending center need not be explained, I would hope.
Elizabeth was the last of the Tudor monarchs as her successor, James I, was a Stuart. Like all the monarchs, the Stuarts had money problems. This family of rulers occupied the Throne when something took place that changed traditional Monarchy forever; and The City was square in the middle of it handling all the credit.
In a nutshell, the second Stuart King, Charles I, lost his head, literally after losing a civil war to the greatest Englishman of them all Oliver Cromwell. History as it is written today is reluctant to even mention Cromwell, which makes me very suspicious.
Cromwells Christian example is one that the diabolical manipulators do not care to make widely known. Everyone should know the truth about Oliver Cromwell.
One of the most important events in modern history a people putting their King on trial and executing him occurred in 1649. Two things made this extraordinary event happen. One, The City of London financed parliament in the civil war against the King. Two, English speaking people had begun reading the King James version of the Bible during the decades previous to the popular uprising against royalty. This revolution was the opposite of the French revolution later, and it is part of a devilish plot that American school children learn about the French fiasco, but not about this earlier event in England.
Interestingly, after the wars when Oliver Cromwell was the Lord Protector and the single most powerful individual in all of England, the City of London flat refused to loan him any more money. So, would you say was calling the shots.
Oliver Cromwell is among my favorites in the parade of human history. I say he, and his ilk were the key to the American Revolution. I got this idea from a lecture in 1981 by Stewart Crane. Crane pointed out what really happened in England at the time of Cromwell, and put events into perspective for me.
As Crane said it: God chose to give the English people his infallible word. He labored upon King James to have the Bible brought into perfect form into the English language and it was delivered to the English people when the printing press was in existence and when the language was in its most precise form.
The obvious truth of that statement hit me like the proverbial ton of bricks. The greatest writers of the language flourished around this period Shakespeare and Milton come quickly to mind. In fact, Milton was a contemporary of Cromwell. This was a period when the language reached its apex. The common people in England had only one book to read the Bible (King James Version). Those who could read, read it and those who couldn't read had it read to them. There was no other entertainment in those days. The English people became saturated with that single book, and the magnificent individualism and morality of Scripture pervaded the people. How could any King maintain the premise of ruling by Divine Right in the face of such learning.
This vital fact of history is not taught at all. Instead our children, if they get any history at all, are told that a bunch of Pilgrims came along and they didn't like the Catholics, the Episcopalians, or any other Christians. These dour people, students are taught, were round heads and obstinate, and they fought against the government and the establishment, and they got kicked out of England and had to start a new colony over in Massachusetts. That is the way history is taught. You are not told that the Bible was put forth when the language of the English-speaking people was at its apex and this was the single greatest influence in the population at the time.
The common language in the street became the language from that Bible. At no other time in modern history have any people been so taken with the word of God as it was the English people in the early 17th century. The King James Bible was published in 1611. Within that generation, 38 years later, the King lost his head. And a devout, God-fearing, scripture-quoting Christian without any church denomination became the reluctant dictator for the next ten years. Oh that horrible Bible it caused the King to be beheaded. No the King caused the King to be beheaded. He was an arrogant, obstinate, corrupt, power-loving jerk, and he left Cromwell no choice.
Oliver Cromwell was the most powerful, yet most tolerant man in the history of London. I heartily recommend reading the relatively recent book Cromwell by Antonia Fraser an honest biography of this great English leader.
Cromwell came to power and did some wonderful things, but the City of London never left power. As sharp as he was, Cromwell never figured out the credit game. When Cromwell needed money to maintain all the military and economic advantages he had created with his genius, they simply said no. He simply accepted it.
Cromwells desire to help Protestantism defeat Catholicism was in actuality part of the beginning of the British Empire. Cromwell saw the need for a powerful navy and pushed Parliament to recognize that four-fifths of this planet is ocean. Good ships were the key and for good ships one must have credit.
The oceans are the key to control of the world. The Portuguese were the first to figure it out, followed by the Spaniards. And then of course lurking behind it all was the City of London and well-financed corporate privateers.
You must know that Christopher Columbus had to have credit he had to have money. It takes credit to have ships outfitted. He went to Isabella of Spain.
Credit rules the world more so today than ever. Credit is establishing the new world order as we speak.
John Cabots voyage was 1497, just a few years after Columbus. So the British corporation had their guy ready to go too. It didn't take long for the word to get around. Spain was the first try controlling the oceans, but they didn't have what it takes.
The London based East India Company was formed in 1600. It was the brainchild of Levant Company Merchants. Remember I said this would be an important word representing a very important part of the world. The Levant Company in London dealt with everything in the Levant Lebanon, Palestine, Syria, Turkey, Jordan, and Egypt.
There were many powerful Jewish individuals in these merchant guilds. There is a general notion today that the Jews were constantly persecuted for five thousand years. We are seldom reminded or told that the richest and most powerful organizations in Northern Europe (the Guilds and the Merchants Guild) had many Jewish members.
The City of London fought to maintain its monopoly over worldwide marketing and merchandising and trade for 200 years. In truth, they had no loyalty to any nation. The created and sold nations as they pleased, merely by extending credit.
Many conspiracy buffs point the finger at The Rothschild, who were, indeed a fascinating family. However, the Rothschilds were never an integral part of the City of London apparently they were well used by the insiders. They only had a connection, starting in October 1806.
The Rothschild history began in the last part of the 1700's in Frankfort, Germany. They weren't really anything special; except they were very astute business people and they stuck together. The family married into itself like mad endogamy it is called. Nathan Rothschild was the famous brother with headquarters in London.
Nathan went to Manchester as a merchant in the 1800's. He was dealing with contraband. In 1810 his fathers ship was caught with an illegal cargo, so Nathan Rothschild was nothing more than a struggling merchant in Manchester, until he married Hanna Cohen, the daughter of Levi Baron Cohen a leading London merchant. The dowry for his wedding was about 3,000 pounds, which was a lot of money in those days. Suddenly he became a full-fledged banker with an association with the Merchants of London. Nathan made the best of it but the Rothschilds were never Crown insiders.
Today, the United States of America is nothing more than a mercenary for the high cabal out of the City of London. Lets move into the 20th century.
In 1902 as the century turned, the Russians and the Japanese were having a little war. The Japanese won because of a navy battle one of the most lopsided naval battles in the history of the world. The Japanese utterly crushed the Russian fleet.
What most people don't know is that the Japanese fleet was built by Vickers and financed entirely by the City of London. The Japanese, in effect, were the mercenaries for The City of London, who never wanted to let Russia off of its landmass and into the oceans.
To rule the world, you must rule the oceans. Every beginner in geopolitics is taught that: Britain never wanted Russia to get out. The Japanese were used weren't they.
For 150 years the most important part of the world to The City was India. The City of London never made so much profit as it did off of the Raj. The corporate entities of London raped this huge sub continent of more wealth than is imaginable that any one group of people could rape another country out of. Gandhi finally came along and the Crown decided to give India its independence. It was cheaper to give Gandhi independence and loan both Pakistan and India the money than it was to fight more wars.
Right now its cheaper for the City of London to have the American taxpayers fixing up the Iraqi oil situation and the geopolitics of the Middle East, because I think they have something planned for the Levant.
Here is another excerpt from Knuth, read it carefully:
Edwin J. Clapp, Professor of Economics at New York University, in his "Economic Aspects Of The War" published in 1915, developed the utterly boundless authority assumed by the "Crown" in its commands to the nations of the world through its "Order-in-Council," used without restraint and without reference to existing usage or so-called International law, by making new International Law to fit any situation, as required.
The Balance of Power is a creation of this financial oligarchy and its purposes are as follows:
(1) To divide the nations of Europe into two antagonistic camps of nearly equal military weight, so as to retain for Britain itself the power to sway a decision either way.
(2) To make the leading and potentially most dangerous military power the particular prey of British suppression and to have the second strongest power on the other side. To subsidize the "Most Favored Nations" with financial investments, and to permit them to acquire political advantages under the beneficent protection of the Sea-Power, to the disadvantage and at the expense of the nations being suppressed.
(3) To subject the continent of Europe to the "Policy of Encirclement" so as to keep the nations of the continent in poverty and ineffectiveness, and thereby prevent the growth of sufficient commercial expansion and wealth to create a rival sea-power.
(4) To retain that complete control and hegemony over all the seas of the world, which was acquired by defeating the allied fleets of its only real rivals, France and Spain, in 1805; and which is artfully and subtly called "The Freedom of the Seas."
(5) To shift this Balance of Power as required so as to be able to strike down friend or foe in the rapidly shifting scene of world power politics, in that inexorable ideology that demands that everything and anything must be sacrificed where the future welfare and expansion to the eventual destiny of the Empire are affected; that eventual destiny outlined by its proponents as the eventual control of All the lands, and All the peoples, of All the world.
The ideology of the British Empire has been outlined in the past by various British statesmen and specifically by Mr. Disraeli (Lord Beaconsfield). The modern version which has been broadened to include the United States as a principal in the British Empire was outlined by Cecil Rhodes about 1895 as follows: "Establish a secret society in order to have the whole continent of South America, the Holy Land, the Valley of the Euphrates, the islands of Cyprus and Candia, the islands of the Pacific not heretofore possessed by Great Britain, the Malay Archipelago, the seaboard of China and Japan and, finally, the United States. In the end Great Britain is to establish a power so overwhelming that wars must cease and the Millenium be realized."
The secret societies of the above plan apparently came to life immediately after the death of Mr. Rhodes in the Pilgrims of Great Britain, often used by British statesmen in recent years as a public sounding board; and the Pilgrims of the United States, the latter founded in New York City on January 13, 1903, and listed in directories of secret societies with no indication or purpose. Mr. Rhodes left a fortune of about $150,000,000.00 to the Rhodes Foundation, apparently largely directed towards the eventual intent of his ideology. One admitted purpose was "in creating in American students an attachment to the country from which they originally sprang . . ." It appears that organizations such as "Union Now," subversive to the liberty and the Constitution of the United States of America, have a large sprinkling of Rhodes scholars among their staff.
The Pilgrims were founded in London July 24, 1902, four months after the death of Cecil Rhodes who had outlined an ideology of a secret society to work towards eventual British rule of all the world, and who had made particular provisions in his will designed to bring the United States among the countries "possessed by Great Britain."
Sir Harry Brittain (high-ranking member of the Pilgrims) records that he was requested to come to New York in 1915 by the Chairman of the American Pilgrims "in order to give him a hand" in welcoming Lord Reading (Rufus Isaacs). The dinner in honor of Lord Reading took place at Sherry's on October 1st, and was attended by 400 representative men prominent in the banking, commercial and political life of the United States.
The magic number of 400, once the symbol of reigning wealth and privilege, appears here in a new role. Men of millions here sway the destiny, the life or death of their fellow citizens, with an organization, which is subversive to the spirit and the letter of the Constitution of the United States, an organization of which not one in one thousand of their fellow citizens has ever heard. The purpose of these men is completely interwoven with the dependence of their own invariably great fortunes on the operations of "The City," citadel of International Finance. Not only do these men collectively exert a planned influence of immense weight in utter secrecy, but they operate with the support of the immense funds provided by Cecil Rhodes and Andrew Carnegie.
The late Robert M. LaFollette, Sr., in the course of a speech in the United States Senate in March, 1908, asserted that fewer than one hundred men control the great business interests of the country. His statement brought forth a nation-wide storm of denunciation and ridicule, and even today any similar statement is invariably derided as "crackpot." Nevertheless, Senator LaFollette conclusively demonstrated a few days later from the Directory of Directors that through interlocking directorates actually less than one dozen men controlled the business of the country, that in the last analysis the houses of Rockefeller and Morgan were the real business kings of America.
This brief look at the history of this entity tells me that the enemy of the people is the high cabal in the boardroom who extends the credit. They are building a new world order. They have the United Nations after all, we wanted peace in our lifetime didn't we.
All of this credit that the high cabal is extending is not good for mankind. It is the exact opposite. Only God is good for mankind and the City of London wouldn't loan God a dime not that he needs it. In fact, God is going to get bad press; the Bible and Oliver Cromwell, and anything decent and good is going to get bad press as long as the extenders of credit run the world and they run the world.
Nothing is going to change unless enough of us get that King James 1611 Bible, and read it prayerfully. Then we must work hard to fully understand Gods word. Just like Cromwell did.
References: Cromwell (greatest Englishman in the history of England) by Antonia Frazier; Rise and Fall of the British Empire by Lawrence James, House of Rothschild Two Volume set by Niall Ferguson (1st volume Moneys Profit and the 2nd The World Banker), The Empire of the City The Jeckal and Hyde Nature of the British Government by E. C. Knuth.
http://web.archive.org/web/20060830100529/http://www.tomvalentine.com/html/history_london.html
Got to love that way back machine @ webarchive when doing research.
No comments:
Post a Comment