The British Telegraph quotes Pentagon and State Department officials saying that Defence Secretary Robert Gates has taken charge of the forces in the American government opposed to a US military attack on Iran. Like any news coming via mainstream media news channels, this piece of ‘information’ cannot be taken at face value. The reasons provided for Gates' reported ‘man of peace’ stance, were concerns about the overstretch of forces and difficulties of fighting another war.
None of this makes any sense at all. For starters, Gates wouldn’t be Secretary of Defence if he wasn’t fully supportive of any of Vice-President Dick Cheney’s pet projects. We can ignore George W. Bush in this context. He is only President because he needed a job and his family served the ruling Judeo-Fascist elite so well for generations. He doesn’t really do anything – apart from looking stupid - that he hasn't been told to do by his coach Cheney.
The overstretch argument makes no sense either. If Iran was – as alleged by the U.S. and the Zionist entity – behind the insurgency, attacking the problem by its roots would be the best way of getting rid of the insurgency. In reality though, the only way to get rid of the difficulties US troops and mercenaries are facing in Iraq is by instructing Mossad, MI5 and CIA to withdraw their special forces and local false-flag terrorists. There is no such thing as an Iraqi ‘insurgency’ group where the leadership is not paid, armed and instructed by the Anglo-Judean Axis of Greed. (I’m not talking about the poor bastards those false-flag terrorist leaders are sending out to blow up themselves in the middle of funeral processions and busy street markets. Those suicide bombers surely believe in their cause!) That means, if the U.S. wanted, they could simply withdraw all their troops from Iraq and send them to Iran.
The overstretch argument makes no sense for another reason. The ‘leaked’ Iran assault plans generously shared with us by Seymour Hersh – who happens to work for one of the most predatory Zionazi publishing houses - and various ‘retired’ U.S. military officers, always talked about air assaults only. According to those ‘leaks’ an Iraq style invasion and occupation was no option because of the overstretching situation in Iraq. Yeah right! While this argument fits nicely into the official version, it doesn’t explain though how an air attack would add to the alleged overstretch situation. Sending off a few thousands cruise missiles or getting their bomber planes to drop off some payload during their daily flights, exercise or not, makes not much of a difference to the overall stretch of the USraeli forces in the region.
What's really happening is that the ruling elite knows all too well that there is a very strong antiwar sentiment within the U.S. population. While they were able to channel that sentiment towards support for the Democratic Party in the last election, they know about the frustration of the electorate with the support of the Democrats under the leadership of crypto-Jews Pelosi and Clinton for the continued engagement in Iraq. Another war, no matter under what pretext, could make the whole situation boil over into a massive revolt and open resistance of U.S. citizens against their own government.
The intention of the Iraq war was always to split Iraq along ethnic lines into a Turkish dominated Kurdish, an Iranian dominated Shi’ite, and an USraeli dominated Sunni sector ruled by some local Quisling. This ‘New Middle-East’ would kill a whole flock of birds with one stone. It would give the Anglo-Judean Axis of Evil better control over the Middle-Eastern oil reserves, it would fulfil the century old Zionist dream of a ‘Greater Israel’ from the Euphrates to the Nile and create ‘Lebensraum’ for a ‘final solution of the Palestinian question’, such as the creation of a Transjordanian Palestininan reservation. And let's not forget the PR value of giving the Kurds their own state.
That regional implementation of the New World Order is obviously behind schedule because of the unexpected resilience of the incumbent Iranian government. If the U.S. had ever seriously intended to attack Iran, they would have done so a long time ago. By now, even another 9/11 wouldn’t do the trick anymore, given the fact that more than half of the U.S. population no longer believes the official conspiracy theory of 12 Arabs with box cutters, and suspects their own government to be behind the attack. The current massive psy-ops campaign against Iran in both mainstream and alternative media, alleging an imminent attack on the Islamic Republic, can only mean that the ruling elite is hoping to influence the powerbrokers behind the current less than cooperative government to install a more compliant team. In other words, if the ruling elite had ever planned an USraeli attack on Iran, by now, for sure, it has been called it off.
Andrew Winkler is the editor/publisher of Sydney based dissident blog ZioPedia.org and founder of Jews Anonymous. He can be contacted on editor@ziopedia.org. You can find more of his articles in the Editorial Section of the ZioPedia.org site.
Source: ZioPedia.org
No comments:
Post a Comment