US Torture Conspiracy - Expose' (Part 2)

Continued from Here

PART7: The Sexual Torture and Mind Control of Govt. Officials and Their Relatives Around the World

In the course of my normal duties in collecting intelligence, I stumbled upon the US sexually torturing civilains for political purposes. I was in Baghdad at a US Embassy party to meet with an Iraqi official.

The CIA wanted me to find out from him, if he was amenable to a certain US proposal. Since I had been a negotiator for the CIA in Russian affairs, I had been picked for this job by the CIA without asking me first what I thought of the proposal. I thought that the proposal was about the worst thing that I had ever seen in intelligence in my nearly forty years in it.

At this meeting that I had with the Iraqi minister, in a private sitting room, he mentioned that he would be willing to support that atrocious US proposal that sold his country out to the US oil companies for as long as there was oil in the ground, if I personally was willing to clear up a problem for him.

It was not a minor problem. It was in essense to secure his place in Iraqi's government by devious means irrespective of elections. I had no doubt that the US govt. was willing to make that deal---I was not. He wanted me personally to guarantee his position, because he did not trust the US govt. not to double-cross him.

It had double-crossed not just Kurds, and other rebelling minorities, but almost everyone in Iraq at least three times over--just to lord their dependent and helpless positions over them. In that way, the US govt. was acting much as it does domestically to deny workers job security, pension security, and health care on the premise that making others insecure made them more controlable. The minister was not asking me to be minister for the rest of his life, but just to have an ordinary job in govt. all his life so that he could support his family.

It was not at all an unreasonable request, and I would have been glad to work towards that, had it not made everyone in his country the equivalent of an economic slave to the oil companies. So, I told him that I would be willing to work to make all Iraqis economically secure and convey his concerns to the US govt. He gripped my hand frantically and said to me, "Please I beg you. Consider my family. Help us." I explained to him that I could not make all Iraqi's slaves to the US govt. just to help him. I told him as we parted to try to be strong and do as good a job for the people of Iraq for as long as he did have a job.

He asked me to predict how long that would be, and I said, "Four months, Allah willing." We parted and he stayed in the room a little longer to do his evening prayers. Many Muslims have wonderful faith in God and are very devoted.

When I returned to the party, the US Ambassador approached me and asked me how the meeting went. I told him honestly, that if the US would make people's lives secure in Iraq, that they were willing to do whatever the US asked of them. He pondered that reply while sipping some white wine that was exceptionally good that evening. I ate the canapes of aged cheese on delicately favored herb crackers made by hand by the equivalent of slave labor in the Embassy kitchen.

Then I sat one back on the silver tray half eaten and said to the Ambassador, "Too bad these smell so badly that I can't eat them." He took my half eaten cracker, popped it in his mouth and said, "It is only the delicious taste of finely aged cheese that I taste." "Messier," I said lapsing into French that he was fluent in, "It is not the taste of cheese that I object to, it is the taste of slavery that I find too foul to stomach."

(See related video "Hearing on US Embassy in Iraq: Mayberry's Opening" at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evRPwwyno_c ).

He blinked anxiously and looked around to see if anyone else had taken my meaning. Reassured that none had, he turned back to me and said as if it were a rhethorical question to which no answer was possible, "What can we as conquerors do about it?" I demonstrated that by turning my back and leaving the party while pulling gently on his hand. When we got to the gate of the Embassy, I invited him to leave with me. He declined politely and went back inside.

I later found out at the CIA, that he returned to the side room, discussed terms with the Iraq Minister and completed the devil's deal. But I fear that the Iraqi Minister was not entirely satisfied with the deal that he made with the devil that night. The US govt. decided to take one of his relatives "hostage"--they turned his wife into a mind control slave. That is, they raped, tortured, and sexually humiliated her in ways that she was forced to forget.

The tapes of that mind control made their way back to the CIA. I was asked to comment on them as to whether she was suitably mind controlled and would act as the proper influence to control him by fear. I told the CIA that no one is so well mind controlled that they will reliably do what one wants and that there had been no reason to do that to her because she had already caused enough fear in her husband's mind that he had sold out.

I had been told in response by Tenet, "We like to hedge our bets and cover all bases." That is, to have an extra little bit of unnecessary control over that Iraqi PM, they had been willing to rape, torture, and mentally enslave an innocent woman. I was thoroughly disgusted and outraged. It was a totally unnecessary black op--even the CIA's dept of Ops had not wanted to do it. The potential for blow-back was enormous.

I then set about discovering how this poor woman had been subjected to this degradation, as in who had proposed it and ordered it. That was not so hard for me to find out. It had been both proposed and ordered by Cheney at the White House Daily Intelligence briefing with Tenet. I listened to that briefing myself after Tenet told me about it. I wanted to find out if Tenet had hinted at it. But that was not the case. However, that did not mean that someone else in the CIA or Tenet at another time had not hinted at that option. So, I offered a prize in the Dept. of Ops to anyone who could prove that Cheney was not the start of that op, including by claiming that they were the author of it. No one came forward to claim the $100,000 prize that I got Tenet to put up the money for.

Instead, I had several CIA operatives try to claim the prize by proving that Cheney had authored the idea. Two of them provided such complete evidence of that that Tenet paid out money for it. One man collected the handwritten notes of Cheney which showed that he had hit upon the idea to do that prior to the daily briefing with Tenet in which he ordered it.

Another did an exhaustive phone analysis showing that no one had discussed the idea with Cheney prior to that by phone. As the daily briefings did not include an prior reference to that op and they had been recorded, that left an informal conversation in the hallway in which Tenet or another person could have suggested it to Cheney. So, although the evidence was not 100% conclusive, it was quite likely that Cheney was the author of that plan which the CIA was loath to do because of the dreadful risk of blow-back.

That risk of blow-back included the risk that no Iraqi official would ever trust the US govt. again. That is, it risked what the oil companies did not want to risk--losing control of that oil. It risked that in order to gratify someone's urge to rape, betray, and humiliate another person when doing so ran counter to US foreign policy interests and was completely unnecessary to do.

The story along these lines is not complete yet. This was not an isolate incident. Alas! When I investigated this more thoroughly, I found that a number of wives and children of foreign leaders had been made into mind control slaves by the CIA in order to control the leader.

Furthermore, the CIA operative who had brought the handwritten note of Cheney, later brought another handwritten note from Cheney which was a list of relatives of foreign leaders and check marks next to the names of those whom he had recently ordered the CIA to mind control for him. The list was up to date and corresponded to the CIA's list of already mind controlled subjects.

The complete CIA list is very extensive and includes many people in foreign countries. Many leaders and candidates for important offices were on that list. It was almost a who's who of important people in the world, both foreign and domestic. Many Congressmen and their family members were on that list. If they knew what had been done Abu Ghraib style to their loved ones they would revolt against the Skull and Bones extended membership that "cremated care" in a ceremony. The damage to those individuals and to the country is infinite and can never be fully rectified.

There is no way to untorture someone. Their trust in humanity has been destroyed forever at a very deep level. It is a crime against humanity on the order of killing the world's hope for a sustainable future. It is worse than the infliction of mere pain. It is the hijacking of a person's life and a selling of their soul to the forces of darkness.

It is a crime eternally worse than the mere murder of someone's body. It is the murder of their will and integrity. Unlike the Bourne Ultimatum movie's depiction of mind control, no one ever volunteers to be tortured, raped, sodomized and become a mind control slave.

How can one recognize if someone is a mind control slave? One watchs to see who their actions benefit. Those who undermine the US Constitution, the rule of law, privacy, the independence of the internet/media, and human rights are either willing traitors to the People of These United States or mind control subjects. Everyone actually does know that undermining these principles sells the world into slavery.

PART 8: US Special Forces as Roving Snuff Film Makers in Iraq

Even though I was a remote viewer for the CIA giving briefings at the Pentagon because of my known accuracy, whatever I said would not be submitted to a court-martial--only the hard evidence that I then collected by the usual means.

When I crested the Iraqi ridge to overlook the given coordinates, I just saw more desert. I parked the jeep in what had been a village of about ten cement foundations. Walking towards the gullies was difficult--the stench! When I looked over their edges, I found the dead bodies about 50 villagers mostly clothed in one and about 20 naked women and children in another. It was obvious that most had been tortured to death.

Those not want to read about gore should skip to the next paragraph. Skin that had been cut methodically in long parallel lines. There were knifes left stuck in bodies in ghoulish fashion, e.g. a blade was stuck between the testicles, the scrotum cut in many parallel lines and peeled back. That body had been positioned in the gully with legs splayed open to terrorize any person later seeing it. The women also had parallel cuts on the breast, between the legs, and sometimes on the face. The children's injuries were mainly on the face and between the legs.

I spent over 4 hours examining the corpses. If my memory serves me, 27 men, 34 women, 11 children and 4 babies, were dead in the gullies. All had physical evidence of torture. I called the Pentagon.

I was too exhasted laid down in the village at dusk to sleep. Towards 2 am I was shivering. I wrapped up in a blanket, but could not get back to sleep. I needed a place to wash up; the well was poisoned by the US troops with feces. I was driving without my lights on by the light of the moon. Iraqis had escaped into the hills and knew about the US massacre. About the second hour of driving, I could feel a car gaining on me with what I feared was murderous intent. I sped up but still did not put my lights on.

Occasionally, their lights flashed on me. As an evasive action, I stopped the jeep, took off the blanket, wrapped rocks in it to make it look like a person asleep by the side of the road and drove off. I was seriously cold this time. But my maneuveur worked; the car stopped following me after it stopped at the blanket. I guess they couldn't deal with the smell. If there were dedicated guerrilla fighters around, a solitary US military Jeep would have been shot at.

Later, I gave a fuller verbal report to the Pentagon. What it added up to was over 100 soldiers spending two days torturing those villagers and then hightailing it out of there because they were afraid of retaliation. To make it worse, there were several Special Forces instructors with them - it was a training exercise in how to torture in villages to get information. Only it had become a "torture everyone to death" drunken party apparently, as American beer cans were left everywhere.

Furthermore, as in torture in general, it had not collected any useful intelligence that the CIA didn't already have. That was easy to prove back at the CIA. Three translators were with the Special Forces during this training.

There were even transcripts made of the tape recordings of the "interrogation" sessions. I read them back at the CIA. Then I listened to one of the tapes to see, if the transcript was accurate. The tapes turned out to be made by actors - all male; there was no screaming of woman and children on any of those tapes. The tapes and the transcripts were part of the cover-up to try to prove the village was filled with male insurgents and the US was correct to torture them all to death.

I then went about finding the actual tapes. No transcripts had been made of them. They were almost impossible to listen to because of the heart rending screaming. I knew what had caused those screams and I had bad PSTD flashbacks to my viewing session as I listened. Then I came across a video recording of part of the event made into a training film on how to get good intelligence from torturing people. They had said that the valuable intelligence that they had gotten in that village was that it was in too unsafe an area to travel in. No, that was the situation that they had created there by torturing that village to death. It was not the situation before they did that. Earlier reports showed that soldiers had stopped there asking for direction and water and been given both and treated civilly by the villagers.

The torture and destruction of the village did not net as much as a single machine gun in it, not a single inflammatory pamphlet, not a single plan of attack. Yet that training video showed men torturing children in front of their parents and saying that the parents were reporting their insurgency plans. I had Iraqi translators listen to the training tapes and they said that the parents were not saying anything like that. Special Forces later said, "Yeah, well those men did say that on other tapes and we lost them!"

Then I tracked down how many tapes they had been issued, how many they returned and had them all listened to. There were no lost tapes. There was not evidence of insurgency in that village. I had CIA analysts review the tapes and transcripts. They also reached the same conclusion; they recommended that the training tape be destroyed before Congress found out the truth. I wrote up my findings and submitted my report to the CIA and the Pentagon. It included the remote viewing of the incident, the photos documenting the torture, and the lack of useful intell collected.

The Pentagon refused to stop using that training tape to show soldiers how to torture in the field to get "intelligence" while in villages.
I went to the Senate Select Intelligence Committee with the training tape and my report. They refused to read my report. I was outraged. I tried to take the story to the NY Times. They refused to take it. I had examined the bodies. I had proved that no useful intelligence had resulted, but no one wanted the story because they wanted to justify torture.

Finally, I told Tenet that either he tell the US Administration the truth about how worthless torture was in getting actionable intelligence, or I would. He sent three CIA analysts with me to the White House "to add balance". Cheney and Bush would only grant us a 15 minute time slot to discuss the topic. I got to speak exactly 2 minutes. The other 3 men lied copiously, asserting torture had produced actionable intelligence.

I challenged them to cite a single example in which torture had yielded intelligence faster and more reliably than other available methods. They couldn't and said that they would have to review their files at the CIA. I offered to pay them $50,000 if they could produce such a case by the next week and present it in front of all of us. Furthermore, I said that if they didn't come back the next week with a valid case and collect the money then they were just liars.

Cheney laughed. Bush asked, "Can I win the $50,000, if I bring the case?" I said, "Sure, but you have to be able to prove that there was not a faster, more reliable way to get that intelligence." "No problem", said Bush, "I'll just ask you to remote view a case in which torture got the information and no other method could" he said to me. Cheney laughed long and hard. Bush said, "What is so funny? I am going to get the $50,000. She knows the answer." One of the analysts said, "That is the problem." "And what is the answer?" Bush asked. "The answer is that a remote viewer can tell you the answer to any question before you even ask it of the suspect," said the analyst. The next week there was no meeting to collect the $50,000. Everyone had conceded.

Yet, the US Administration refused to give up its torture programs. That training film was not the only film made in that village: I later uncovered a whole shelf of other films made during those two days. They got sold on the black market as snuff and S&M films at a high profit. I tracked down who made that profit and how much was made. Then I had my real answer as to why I couldn't get those torture programs shut down. US Official, including Pentagon Generals were making a killing off them. The training video was being used as the marketing tool - the "legal film" that they could hawk in front of buyers.

I got one of those snuff films given to me as a gag at a CIA Awards ceremony. I had won the award for the most obnoxious report. It was that report, not because it was so grisly, but because it had almost killed one of the Cabal owner's major sources of revenues. Those films sold for about $100,000 a piece on the high-end black market. Rich Skull and Bones buyers often bought 6 of them at once; they were not all from one Iraqi village. They liked it best if they got them straight a high US Official.

It gave an extra celebrity angle to it. They could then entertain their country club friends with it saying, "I got this the other day from so and so. I know him well." That meant in country-club code - you can do business with me, whatever we do illegal will be overlooked because I have an in with the big boys that run the country." So, that flick of the women and children being tortured to death meant, "See, even if our business deals kill women and children in other countries, no one is going to come after us for it. The proof of that is this flick, that shows worse than what we are going to do, and no one coming after them for it."

The US Govt. never court-martialed the soldiers, nor stopped the "torture in villages" Special Forces policy. They acted as roaming torture and death squads terrorizing the civilian population.

Part 9:The CIA Trained "Insurgents" to Attack Iraqi Oil Fields to Justify Their Holding the Oil Fields

This case was assigned to me by an impatient General while I was at the Pentagon giving a CIA data plus remote viewing briefing on a different sector. Remote viewing data had been validated in CIA and Pentagon studies to be greater than 80% accurate using average remote viewers trained up to military standards (See the Science of Non-Physical Perception by Courtney Brown).

Because of my known excellent accuracy in one CIA designed state of mind the Pentagon had used me since during the Vietnam War, both as a viewer and a trainer of viewers. (My main role was always as a remote viewer for DCIs.) What I said initially was purely remotely viewed data and tagged as such; 2 days later I went to the town to collect the hard data.

Before the 2003 war started, the town had had over 20,000 inhabitants. It was founded to house oil field workers and their families some decades earlier. (If I had a detailed map of Iraq I could probably pinpoint its location, though the CIA has tried to erase all proper nouns from my mind, through putting in blocks under torture.) There was no natural source of water nearby. After the US bombed the water pipeline to the town, the only water was trucked in. Early in the war the US entirely took over that set of oil fields They said that they did that to prevent the rigs from being sabotaged. But even after they built fencing and guard towers in a huge rectangle around the rigs, they did not re-employ the Iraqi workers or share the oil profits with the Iraq people.

Officially, the US had said before the war that the oil would remain in the hands of the Iraqi people. The Iraqi people depended on that source of revenue to buy food, medicines, and parts in order to have clean water and electricity, etc. Through a series of CIA black ops and deceptive US Administration policies, the US gained control of Iraqi oil.

Often they made it appear that others stole it, in order to accomplish the deception. But CIA records in 2004, showed that over 90% of the Iraqi Oil was in the hands of US based multinational companies. Since most of the US Administration had been employed in oil and defense industries in the past, that was no surprise; it was the intended result of the war.

The town underwent massive unemployment, starvation, and even death from lack of water. The US kept bombing the water pipe to it. Internal CIA documents that I read later said that the point of the bombing was to force the local population to flee or die. The population of the town was down to 6,000 by the time of this incident. The US did not want an Iraqi town next to "their" oil field, regarding it as nothing more than a security risk to eliminate. The US policies caused enmorous resentment in the town's people. It was completely predictable. It was also intentional.

Other CIA documents I later read to write a report on this incident showed that the US was trying to force Iraqis into violence at the edges of the oil fields in order to justify the US's continued guarding them and holding them. Because the townfolk were too poor to afford weapons, the CIA had to smuggle weapons and explosives into the town in order to get an insurgency going.

It is well known that sending armed troops through a town kicking down doors indiscrimantely arouses civilian resistence. Just like it is well known that denying people work and food creates rebellion. The yield of weapons on the first search of that town in 2003 was some pistols and rifles of the sort used for hunting desert animals. The second search of the town found CIA supplied machine guns, no CIA explosives, and two machine guns not from the CIA. The CIA later found out that the people wanted machine guns to protect themselves from the US army destroying their homes, but seeing no use for the explosives had traded them for two other machine guns.

The CIA then went about supplying more explosives and training some 60 workers in how to use them in a supposed "Al-Qaeda" camp. A couple of months after that that they caught the first explosion on film. The CIA asked their intermediary why the explosion had only been half as large as expected. He said that the workers were afraid of explosives close to the oil field, even though they had been told it would be safe on that side of the fence that far from the rig.

The workers were getting paid by the CIA for this explosion -it was their only source of income. They intially believed the lies of the intermediary that the funds and weapons were coming from a Muslim cleric who ordered them to have a jihad. Since the CIA found the Muslim clerics usually too slow for their tastes to order such things, it was standard to say that the help came from Bin Laden, Al-Queada, or a local cleric (see the Ace of Spies TV series about the Russian Trust if you need a greater understanding of how an intelligence agency sets up an opposition group to use to its advantage.)

Some of the clerics complained about their names and their religion being hijacked to help the CIA's dirty tricks to steal the oil. It was documented in Afghanistan, that the CIA had created a militant form of the Muslim religion and supplied textbooks to make children more militant to get the Afghanis to fight the Russians in the 1980's.

One CIA document was about the cost effectiveness of arms that the CIA had put in that particular town in terms of creating a news event in the US to justify the war. The conclusion of the document was a fixed formula for the amount of explosives to machine guns for future operations, having decided that the size of the explosions on the perimeter had been too small to merit much news attention.

And that was after the US set up the security camera to catch the explosion on film and sent it with an article to CIA journalists working at US newspapers (Read books, such as In Search of Enemies by ex-CIA officer and ex-head of the Angolian War, John Stockwell, if you are unfamiliar with these standard CIA dirty tactics to cause the US public to support a war. Or watch the documentary "The Fire This Time: Why LA Burned" from Rhino films for an example of the similar CIA tactics used in South East Central Los Angeles.)

The CIA denied half of the payment for the explosion because it was only half sized. They then supplied more explosives and ordered the full amount set off at the same spot where the camera was set up already. The Iraqis said that they wanted half of the payment up front, this time. The CIA paid it again as if coming from a cleric. But the Iraqis refused to set off the explosion. They were suspicious that they were asked to do it at the same location and feared arrest. They also felt that they had been underpaid and cheated.

On the third sweep through the town, Special Forces had killed over a hundred people pretty much at random and resentment ran high afterwards. But still there was no explosion at the fence. The Iraqis saw no point to doing it. The CIA again resupplied the explosives, thinking that they had traded them for food or water piping.

Two days passed and the CIA grew concerned that the Iraqis had figured out they were the paymasters. It asked the Pentagon to go through the town again, this time with interrogators, about a fourth of them supplied by the CIA, to collect the weapons, the explosives, and to kill those they had trained as "insurgents". The CIA was afraid that the previous news story would be exposed as faked, if only to Aljezera TV. (See the JFK movie and the book Plausible Denial by Mark Lane, as examples. Ruby killed Oswald to prevent the US public from finding out that the news that Oswald killed JFK as a lone gunman was faked news).

The CIA having trained those "insurgents" had photos of them. But they didn't want the Pentagon to know that the CIA had supplied and trained the "insurgents", so the CIA did not even tell the CIA interrogators. Those first interrogators torturing in that town, kept calling up the Pentagon saying that they had found everyone and everything that was dangerous and asking for the call back to base order. They knew that they were in danger of being overrun by the town's people. The CIA knew that they had not killed enough people yet. So, they insisted to the Pentagon that the interrogators were not done.

The US govt. was so intent on killing those so-called insurgents that the Pentagon never gave that call back to base order. The interrogators were doing what Bush lawyer Yoo said Bush reserved the right to do, they were torturing innocent children to try to make the parents talk. Since most of the parents were innocent, the names that they gave as insurgents were nothing more than guesses. Even to save their own skins, the interrogators were not able to torture the truth out of people to find the "insurgents". They had killed only 3 of 60 of them after torturing many people to death. Given the number of people they had killed it was expected that they would have killed 2 "insurgents" by chance alone.

Periodically, the US soldiers had fired into the crowd to get them to scatter. It was likely that a third one was killed merely because he was braver than most other people and stood closer. The pitiful screams of small children stirred up the town's hostility. The US men called for back-up since they were not allowed to cut and run. The back up sent was tanks, not choppers, in this war on the cheap. Finally, the crowd just rushed the US forces in spite of the machine guns. The back up did not arrive for more than 4 hours too late. All of the US forces were killed: the Pentagon and CIA attributed some of the deaths to other causes on later dates to avoid an investigation of the incident.

PART 10: The Pentagon "Cover-up" That Expanded the Sexual Torture-- Continued from Part 9

The street was littered with dead bodies, including naked women and children that had been tortured to death. Iraqis had taken photos of them. Two of them had gotten into the hands of a foreign journalist and been sent to his office in Paris. He worked for a newspaper that the Pentagon felt it did not have automatic censorship at, unlike most US media. As I spoke by remote viewing the town for the Pentagon, over 200 re-enforcement Special Forces and ordinary US Army men were torturing civilians to try to find all of the photos. The Pentagon already knew that the photos had reached Paris. So, even if one believed that torturing people was the way to get that information, that information was not relevant to the cover-up that the Pentagon wanted to do.

Instead, it was making more of the same mess. More photos of the US atrocity were being made by the Iraqis who were outraged at the torture of children. The original two photos showed the mutilation of infants. Gory to the end of paragraph: One of those, a boy, had had his penis cut off and long lines of knife wounds down both legs. The other photo was of a girl infant with a large hole carved into her bottom the size of an adult vagina and blood smears down her legs and on her belly. Both infants were dead.

I stated quite bluntly that it was impossible to attempt any cover-up of a crime, while one was still enlarging it. Then I said that cover-ups were rarely successful if more than 10 people knew about the crime and that there were more than 50 people in the briefing room. The General said, "Stop the moralizing, and get to the point. What should I do?" I recommended that the military stop their assault and send a negotiator out to the newspaper from the CIA's Paris office. Unfortunately, the US did not pull out of the town until another 4-6 hours of torturing civilians, before they gave up the task as hopeless. Then they tried to carpet bomb the town to destroy the evidence of the atrocity. Again they extended the crime. "Carpet bombing" sounds like it would destroy that kind of evidence. That is rarely the case, bombs make a scatter pattern not a carpet.

Two days later, I was on the ground at what was left of that town. I knew in advance, by remote viewing, that there would be many wounded without medical care. As I am a physician, I had detoured into the nearest city and hired as many physicians, nurses, medical people and ambulances as possible. I arrived with about 20 vehicles and drivers able to act as ambulances (about half of them taxis) and about 34 staff to do triage and load them. Within 30 minutes the Pentagon was in an uproar trying to call me because they saw from the sat images that I had relief helpers. As I had lost my mobile phone, they were unable to get me on a phone to order me to cease and desist.

About 20 minutes later that they got a chopper out to me. I outranked the chopper pilot. I loaded it with wounded and conscripted it to evacuate the wounded to the hospital. I told them I would call the Pentagon after the critically wounded were transported. It was not until the next morning, that the US Army drove up with tanks and threatened to fire upon me and the staff that I had the next interference. I told the staff to move to the side. Then told the tank commander who I again outranked officially, to either give me command of his tanks or to fire upon me. He gave me command of his tanks. I then used them to help pull the ruble of houses off wounded who were pinned down but still alive.

Because of the stench of the dead and public health risk, we had started burying them after taking photos of their faces to identify them to their relatives. Because the medical staff was more useful to the rescue work, I had given the photographing task to the taxi drivers as they waited for their cars to be loaded. Gory to end of paragraph: Some injuries from torture were later evident in those photos, esp. where the torture had involved cuts to the face, mainly in women and children.

The Pentagon later complained that I had purposely photographed torture injuries to document them. Perhaps I should have. Some people might complain that I did not do enough to document the torture injuries. There was more than enough evidence of torture at the hospitals, carved into the flesh of the still living. I did the best that I could under the circumstances that I was in, knowing that I would be tortured by the Pentagon on my return for even the little I had done to help the survivors. Had I not gone to that town myself, the US Army would have just bulldozed the dead and the wounded into mass graves and covered them over as per their usual way of covering up their atrocities. What they really wanted me to do in Iraq was to track down all the photos and burn them. But they had not made the order explicit. The order read "Undertake the necessary clean up measures to contain the problems at X location." I took the problem to be the risk to public health of the unburied corpses and did contain it.

Gory to end of paragraph; The most common injuries were to the testicles--bruising, crushing, lacerations, and burns. Some of the wounded were able to tell us what had happened, including to their own bodies. A common torture implement was a pair of pliers, the tip of a machine gun pressing onto the testicle with a soldier leaning his weight on it with the man on the ground, and lighters, cigarettes, knives, or kicks or stomps. Of the injuries that I saw from torture, wounds to the testicles made up about half of them. Wounds to the penis, breasts, vagina, and rectum were next most common. Wounds to the face were among the least common but the hardest to forget. One facial wound that I saw at least three different times on young girls and babies was to slit the cheeks from the corner of the mouth towards the molars. Since there were often jagged tears of the edge towards the molars, it appeared that oral rape had followed. The point of the injury appeared to inflict pain during the oral rape.

I did not call the Pentagon back until the next day. They were furious with me. By that time, I had 4 choppers and two tank units working full time in the rescue operations which we were just finishing up. After listening to 10 minutes of swearing at me on the phone line which was not secure, I brought the General up short with, "Sir, have you yet asked me whether I called you on a secure line." He was unable to contain his swearing so I hung up the phone after politely telling him that the "KGB" had heard everthing he had said so far. In any case, he had spilled much information on the US atrocity to the Russians by then. As a result of his foul mouthed comments, they examined their earlier satellite images of the US torturing civilians in the street in broad daylight.

In my next meeting with the Russians in the ongoing negotiations that the CIA had me doing with them to limit terrorism, they laid those images on the bargaining table. Sat. images these days are so good that one can tell when people are being tortured by others with a great deal of reliability. The capability exists to monitor torture worldwide by this and other means, and report more than 99% of it within an hour of it starting. That is what the US and its allies would do if it were interested in ending terrorism, as opposed to dominating the market. When torture happens these days it is not because the world's intelligence agencies don't know about it. It is because they are complicit in it by not taking the sat. images to their news outlets like Pravda and getting them published. I scolded the Russians that they had not exposed the US terrorism in Iraq and refused to make the bargain that they wanted.

They wanted the US to ignore their terrorism in Chechnya, in exchange for ignoring the US terrorism in Iraq and Afghanistan. Two wrongs do not make a right. It is the duty of one's allies and enemies to point out one's errors so that one can correct them quickly before one has to answer to God for them. Christ healed people, not tortured them. He raised the dead, not killed people. He gave money to the poor, not underpaid them and taxed them.

I was able to recover all copies of the original two photos, including from the Paris office of the newspaper in question. I offered to give them all of the photos I had and my personal testimony, if they would publish a full two pages of expose on it. After listening to me for an hour they decided that the story was "too raw" for their readers. They gave me back the two photos. They were not really committed to publishing the truth, only to increasing their circulation. The Pentagon was scandalized by my attempt to expose them, but happy with the end result. I always tried to expose wrongdoing whereever I found it, if I thought doing so had a good chance to correct it.

I was tortured for 4 days in the basements of the Pentagon and CIA for helping the wounded, even though I recovered the photos. Those men that ordered me tortured were not Christians. They were into maximizing the suffering of others, not turning the other cheek, or helping the poor or loving their enemies. The order for that torture was signed by Bush as Commander in Chief, though he was never elected to that office in a fair election with an auditable paper trail. The type of torture to be used was specified by Cheney using foul language. It was heavy into excrement, electrical sexual torture, and drownings to the point of unconsciousness in water contaminated with his urine and feces. Those orders went to Rumsfeld and Tenet who had torturers write up the detailed protocols that carried their signatures.

by SUE ARRIGO, M.D original articles here - http://www.conspiracyplanet.com